Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

BTI’s Rants and Ramblings: Pandemic Should Force Improved, Local Non-Conference Schedule

I recently read this article from The Athletic about non-conference scheduling in college basketball and that mid-majors are starting to find scheduling games with the Power schools more difficult because of the pandemic and less profitable as budgets are tightening and the financial guarantees these schools get from schools like Kentucky.  Additionally, the mid-major schools are especially in need of extra funds so they are more willing to do one-off games, rather than asking for the 2 for 1 deals that are often struck.

And in the case of Kentucky, those kinds of deals have limited Kentucky’s ability to schedule some of our in-state schools, namely Murray State and Western Kentucky.  And while the fans certainly have no knowledge of what it takes to run an athletic department and how difficult it can be to make a college basketball schedule, there is no doubt that almost no fans approve of the way the schedule has shifted under John Calipari.  Rarely do the Cats have a marquee non-conference home game and when they do it is either Louisville or a forced SEC-Big 12 game.  UK no longer plays North Carolina, Indiana, Notre Dame, or any other regular opponent of the 2000’s and before.  But a secondary complaint has been the games that have been scheduled at Rupp have been less than stellar too.  No opponents that would interest the average fan.  Richmond?  No thanks.  A slew of opponents from the MAC, Big South, and all conference in between have left season holders begging for more.

Well, Corona Virus has given us an opening.  Here’s why:

(1) Teams are going to be hesitant to travel long distances for quite some time.  Utah Valley and Saint Mary’s are not coming here any time soon.  You know who would not have to travel far?  The other Division-1 schools in Kentucky.  Murray State (266 miles), Western Kentucky (153 miles), Northern Kentucky (82 miles), Louisville (77 miles), Morehead St. (64 miles), and Eastern Kentucky (28 miles) all are easy driving distance from Lexington.  No crossing of state lines.  Almost all fans from the state.  From a health perspective, this would be best.

(2) These schools need funds so badly right now.  Their budgets are going to be in dire straights for some time.  So there might be some flexibility on the standard 2 for 1 deals.  What if Kentucky agrees to go home and home with Louisville every year like we already do, then rotate one road game a year for 5 years with WKU, EKU, Murray, Morehead, and Northern with the other four coming to Rupp?  So a 5-year series with each of those schools, with one home game guaranteed for each.  Can you imagine the excitement in Richmond, Morehead, and NKU if the Cats are coming to town?  Don’t you think it wouldn’t be the end of the UK program to throw those schools a bone once in 5 years?

(3) Fans are going to be hesitant to come to an arena anyway for a few years possibly.  Doesn’t the school owe it to us to try and put the most interesting home schedule possible together?  Trust me, I don’t care how bad the in-state schools are, the fans would show up to watch those games over Siena, Detroit, Alabama A&M, Radford, etc.  Every single time.  It’s a win win.  Fans get a better product.  School gets larger crowds.

And it doesn’t have to stop there.  I think many fans in the northern parts of the state have long clamored for a series with Cincinnati.  What about Xavier?  They are a top tier program, and again, if you don’t think so, I think they are better than Tennessee Tech, don’t you?  The folks in the eastern part of the state would love to see a rivalry with West Virginia.  And of course there is Indiana.  Now would be a perfect time to reignite that series as well.  Again, short travel distances for fans (no flights needed), a built in interest from fans, and an improvement from many of the games on the schedule.

So I know the non-conference schedule for this year is set but what if a non-conference schedule for 2021-22 looked like this:

Duke (Champions Classic, New York)
North Carolina (CBS Sports Classic, Las Vegas)
Indiana (Indianapolis)
Morehead State (Rupp)
Northern Kentucky (Rupp)
Western Kentucky (Rupp)
Eastern Kentucky (Rupp)
Cincinnati (Rupp)
West Virginia (Rupp)
Louisville (Rupp)
Xavier (at Xavier)
Kansas (Big 12 Challenge, at Kansas)
Murray State (at Murray)

That schedule right there is comprised of 13 non-conference games.  There are 3 neutral site games (Indiana, Duke and North Carolina).  There are seven home games and 3 true road games (Murray State, Xavier, and Kansas).  Not enough home games?  Kentucky plays 8 or 9 home games during a normal non-conference season.  We are throwing the in-state schools a favor and that cuts back one game.  But when you consider the 9 home games last season were EKU, Evansville, Utah Valley, Mount St. Marys, Lamar, UAB, Farleigh Dickinson, Georgia Tech, and Louisville.  I’m sorry, but I am willing to take one less home game if all of the home games are of interest.

I am well aware that it isn’t as easy as just saying here are the 13 opponents we want and make it happen.  But travel is going to be a concern for schools and fans alike in the coming years.  I understand the 13 games above are not going to happen.  But I think making it a priority to schedule the in-state schools moving forward should be a must.  The home schedule has become an embarrassment in my opinion.  Not because the overall quality of opponent is that poor.  But because the home fans experience has been completely trashed.  There is hardly ever an opponent worth watching at Rupp, unless Louisville or the Big 12 opponent comes in.

Bring in 4 of the 5 in-state schools every year, Louisville and Indiana every other year, I think fans will be more than content with that schedule.  The pandemic has opened this door.  Let’s try and walk through it Mitch.

Article written by Bryan the Intern

7 Comments for BTI’s Rants and Ramblings: Pandemic Should Force Improved, Local Non-Conference Schedule



  1. Realme
    10:10 am May 13, 2020 Permalink

    Umm, rewrite ideas from Drew much?



  2. jhnny
    10:15 am May 13, 2020 Permalink

    I agree, this home schedule is light years better than what UK has right now. Honestly, the home schedule is a nightmare, I’m not even sure why people still pay for season tickets. And you only have to go back a few years when the SEC was simply awful, and the home schedule was even worse. UK is too good a school to play such a crappy and uninteresting home schedule. Play the instate schools every year- and yes, play one of them on the road- great idea. The more interesting part of this proposed schedule, however, is adding West Virginia, Cincinnati, Xavier and Indiana. Those are regional teams that are pretty decent and some year, very good. They should be on the schedule every year.



  3. Willmunny
    10:23 am May 13, 2020 Permalink

    I don’t think this is in the program’s long-term best interests. I know people who are alums of each of NKU, EKU, WKU, Murray, and MSU and are fans of both UK and their regional state school. The same goes for people who live in the area. Because the schools generally play different competition and rarely meet, they don’t consider themselves rivals. Having UK go to these gyms would bring out the hard core fan base of the schools and could divide the loyalties of the “dual” fans. I can envision a small local gym getting hostile in a relatively close game for a while, fans acting up, a UK player doing something that can be perceived as disrespectful back to those fans, and a “pick a side” mentality growing. UK doesn’t need to divide its fan base or create more rivals. UK’s season is preparation for the NCAA tournament. It has enough games in small, loud, hostile gyms in the SEC. I like the current non-conference model of having Louisville or the SEC/BIG 12 opponent as the only true road game. I would like to see more neutral site games played later in the season and mix up the conference schedule by playing the 5 teams we will play twice for the first time in November/December.



  4. Bruce Dickinson
    11:25 am May 13, 2020 Permalink

    I like the idea of Kentucky playing the in state schools more. Why give the money to a program that hates you instead of an in state school that has a lot of UK fans enrolled. I went to Morehead and most of the students that I knew loved Kentucky basketball. At least the ones that grew up in Kentucky.



  5. T-Town Cat
    12:23 pm May 13, 2020 Permalink

    Joe B. Hall would not play in-state schools because he wanted people in Murray, Morehead, Bowling Green, etc to remain UK fans and not cheer against the Cats when they played the local teams.



  6. wesmorgan1
    12:34 pm May 13, 2020 Permalink

    Let’s emphasize the “local” part of that…

    I’ve said for years that we need a “Kentucky Basketball Showcase” – a traveling event that spotlights all levels of college basketball in the Bluegrass State. Imagine a D1, DII/III, and NAIA tripleheader:

    Year 1: Kentucky-Bellarmine in Rupp with Transylvania/Centre and Georgetown/Asbury (Bellarmine goes D1 in 2020-21)
    Year 2: Louisville-Murray State in Yum! with Kentucky State/Spalding and Campbellsville/Thomas More
    Year 3: NKU-Morehead State in BB&T with Kentucky Wesleyan/Berea and Asbury/UCumberlands
    Year 4: EKU-WKU in McBrayer with Transylvania/Kentucky State and Union/Pikeville
    etc.

    Schedule this on a Saturday, couple it with an all day “college admissions fair” event open to all Kentucky schools, give decent appearance monies to the D2/D3/NAIA schools to boost their programs…it’s time we gave this kind of exposure to our D2/D3/NAIA teams.

    After all, most folks don’t realize that 10 Kentucky schools have 30+ championship (and 15+ Final Four) banners hanging in their gyms…



  7. kentuckyrld
    4:04 pm May 13, 2020 Permalink

    Cincinnati? No thank you. Not now; not ever.