Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

Kentucky Football 2017 Statistical Benchmarks

Pic by Food+Tech Connect

2016 presented inconsistencies along several statistical classifications. For example, Kentucky ranked first in the SEC’s 4th down conversion category but finished dead last in punting and turnover margin. Remarkable.

This post will analyze three statistical categories: Non-Negotiable Improvements, Advantage Developments, and Sustains. Each category will highlight statistical collections that must be vastly improved, somewhat increased, or simply maintained. First, we’ll define the categories:

  • Non-Negotiable Improvements are self-explanatory. For UK to enjoy a successful season it must address and immensely improve upon the listed statistical classifications.
  • Advantage Developments examine actions that were not listed in the upper half of the league but needs to show some improvement in order for Kentucky to better its win/loss record from a year ago.
  • Sustain is easy. No change, continue status quo, keep on keeping on, keep on truckin’; you get the picture.

Pic by USA Today

Non-Negotiable Improvements

Turnover Margin

2016: Recovered 8 fumbles, intercepted 13 passes for a +21 margin. Conversely, UK lost 16 fumbles, threw 12 interceptions for a total of -28. Combined, it formulated a -7 total turnover margin (14th or last in the SEC).

2017 Goal: This number needs to be in the +2 level at a minimum. Mid-pack in the league was a +3 a year ago. This digit’s reduction will assist most all other statistical areas of concern. Last year’s turnovers twisted potential blowout wins into nail biters (Vanderbilt) and potential close game victories into losses (Georgia).


2016: 61 punts, 2335-yards, 38.3 yards per, allowed 125 return yards for a 2-yard average, kicked 5 touchbacks which equaled a total 34.6 net yards per punt (SEC-14th)

2017 Goal: Again, just shooting for mid-level production, a 39-40-yard net punt average would greatly improve field position and ease strain on the defense. Strategic, inside the ten-yard line punt placement also needs immense upgrading. Regardless, punting has to drastically improve.

3rd Down Defense

2016: Opponents converted 80 of 180 3rd down attempts for a 44.4% success percentage (SEC-13th)

2017 Goal: 39% would provide Eddie Gran’s offense with more possessions which could translate to additional points. 39% ranks in the middle of the SEC. Plus, getting off the field has been a struggle for Stoops’ defense throughout his tenure. Personnel shortages have greatly impacted this deficiency. 3rd down defense improved down the stretch in 2016 which could act as a precursor for this number to drop even further.

Rush Defense

2016Opponents had 576 carries for 2966-yards, 25 TDs. 5.1 yards per attempt and 228 yards per game ranked 12th in the SEC.

2017 Goal: A realistic goal and more likely a blue lensed view would be for the Wildcats to allow 195-200 yards per game. Lack of proven defensive line depth significantly factors in this estimation. However, UK has an upper-level linebacker corps and secondary which includes the conference’s top two returning tacklers: LB Jordan Jones (109) and Safety Mike Edwards (100). I’m least confident in rush defense improvement than all other statistical projections within this study.

Pic by Kansas City Star

Advantage Developments

Quarterback Sacks

2016Kentucky produced 21 QB sacks for a -171 yards (SEC-11th)  

2017 Goal: A conservative 29. 83% of last year’s sacks came from the linebackers. Josh Allen and Denzil Ware combined for 12.5 a year ago. That total was more than Bud Dupree and Za’Darius Smith combined for in their last season in Lexington. Factor in LB Jordan Jones, Jamar “Boogie” Watson, and a potential rookie or two and 29 is easily an attainable goal.

The Cats had several close call sacks during which the quarterback escaped pressure in 2016. The most important number here is the aforementioned 83%. The defensive line and select defensive backs will need to increase its contribution in order for total sacks to increase by eight.

Tackles for Loss

2016: 69 tackles for loss for -277 yards, averaged 5.39 TFL per game.  

2017 Goal: 80. This column has varied over the years. From 54 in Stoops’ first season to 65 in Bud Dupree and Za’Darius Smith’s last season in Lexington. 2015’s 53 TFLs was last in the league. Kentucky’s jump to 69 a year ago was quite impressive but not surprising with four explosive linebackers. Matter of fact, LB Jordan Jones (15.5 TFL) and LB/DE Denzil Ware (12 TFL) are the league’s number one and three returning leaders in this category respectively. 

Scoring Offense

2016: Scored 49 touchdowns, 44 extra points, two 2-point conversions, 16 field goals for 390 total points, 30 points per game (SEC-9th) 

2017 Goal: 35 points per game. A decrease in turnovers will increase scoring opportunities. Couple that with a sustained, efficient Red Zone offense and it’s easy to envision UK adding five points per game.

Scoring Defense

2016: Allowed 50 touchdowns, 48 extra points, one 2-point conversion, 19 field goals, 407 total points, 31.3 points per game (SEC-11th)  

2017 Goal: 27 points per game. With question marks surrounding its defensive line, projecting the Wildcats to decrease its total points per game by four-points per game is a realistic approach. This number isn’t as much of a reflection of an ineffective defense but more out of respect to offenses it will face. Many are expected to light up scoreboards. Missouri, Georgia, Louisville, South Carolina, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, and even Florida are all projected to possess more offensive weapons in 2017. Expect several shootouts.

Pic by SEC Country


Offensive 4th Down Conversions

201612 out of 16 attempts, 75% (SEC-1st)

2017 Goal: More of same

Rushing Offense

2016: 560 carries, 3044 yards, 5.4 yards per carry, 30 touchdowns, 234.2 yards per game (SEC-3rd)

2017 Goal: Continued success. The Cats will be in more shootout games this fall. Its ability to maintain line-of-scrimmage management and a physical run game will be the separating factor that could catapult Kentucky to an improved win total. Ramifications of losing Stanley Williams will be quickly identified.

RB Benny Snell is an established, 1000-yard rusher. Finding a rotation behind Snell will be paramount. Promising freshmen AJ Rose and Bryant Koback are capable, fast, and powerful. Sihiem King is a change of pace and direction back that could get quality carries.

QB Stephen Johnson is the key to the Kentucky rushing game. He must be able to present the threat of an RPO (Run-Pass-Option) to keep additional defenders from stacking the box. In addition, a higher completion percentage of short to intermediate pass plays can also act as a preventer from opponents focusing solely on stopping the run.

Pass Defense

2016: Opponents attempted 352 passes, completed 202, 13 interceptions, 57.4%, 2679 yards, 7.6 yards per, 20 touchdowns, 206.1 yards per game (SEC-5th) 

2017 Goal: Projecting a number here is difficult. This category will be greatly impacted by pass rush and an increase of quarterback sacks. UK has talented cornerbacks and an elite safety. It has a top-5 SEC secondary. However, numbers are driven by exterior influences. 

Red Zone Offense

2016: Converted 36 times from 42 trips to Red Zone, 85.7%, 25 touchdowns, 11 field goals

2017 Goal: Sustain success and become more diverse

Field Goal Percentage

2016: Attempted 19 field goals, converted 16 for 84.2% (SEC-3rd)  

2017 Goal: Kicker Austin MacGinnis is one of if not the best kicker in the history of the University of Kentucky. Enough said.

What does all this mean?

Numbers don’t lie. 2016 was an anomaly as Kentucky was last in turnover margin and punting yet won 4 SEC games. Depth, experience, and player development are all catch phrases that could be displayed in hard data in 2017.

Article written by Freddie Maggard

Former University of Kentucky Quarterback and Andy Griffith Fan Club President

5 Comments for Kentucky Football 2017 Statistical Benchmarks

  1. Fern Daddy
    4:40 pm July 25, 2017 Permalink

    Always appreciate the analysis, Freddie. I’ve heard several fans picking on the D-Line for being the weakest link from last season, and many expect that to be the case in 2017…But when an offense averages more than two turnovers/game, they’re not doing their defense any favors, especially the big boys in the trenches.

    • foamfinger
      11:14 am July 26, 2017 Permalink

      Very true about turnovers not helping the DL, but the run game really does help a lot, especially down the stretch last year. It’s exciting to know that the DL has been going up against one of the top OL in the conference everyday, especially the younger redshirt guys who are expected to start contributing this year. They won’t be AS wide-eyed against SEC competition.

  2. AdamN
    11:59 pm July 25, 2017 Permalink

    Freddie… wow. Respect, brother. I see the work you’re putting in. So many numbers and statistics. KSR/Matt Jones, this guy is top notch. Give that man some more money.

    Please stick around for a while Freddie

  3. TBW3011
    8:50 am July 26, 2017 Permalink

    Better punting and QB play and this team can do something special.

  4. InigoMontoya
    9:17 am July 26, 2017 Permalink

    Freddie, I’m placing this here because I don’t know how to use Twitter.
    Last year some players from Alabama said that UK played “more physical” than any team up to that point. And I began to ask myself what that means. I don’t think that it means that UK was stronger than other teams, because everyone in the SEC is strong.

    I came up with 3 things I think would cause someone to say that: Multiple Hits, Punches, and Players.

    Multiple Hits would be once our guys block someone, they extend the block & continue hitting them multiple times until the whistle blows.

    Multiple Punches would be the same type of thing, making sure the hands are well placed and repeatedly hitting the defenders.

    Multiple Players would mean that after a player has the opponent disengage, our player would find someone else to hit, perhaps someone who has already been blocked once or twice. (that would be annoying to be on the receiving end). The principle would be to always look for an extra guy to hit once your assignment has been carried out.
    It would also certainly mean more tacklers than usual (or necessary). Always getting that extra guy in on a tackle.

    Freddie, am I anywhere close to correct? Are there other things that I’m overlooking? I think most fans would be interested in what “more physical” means as a practical matter. Thanks.