Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

Does Kentucky follow the latest trend of college basketball?

College basketball has been incredibly weird this season.

We’ve seen more top ten and top 25 losses in the history of the sport, with blue blood programs Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina, and Kansas combining for 26 losses on the year. Just last weekend, eight top 25 teams lost to unranked or lower-ranked opponents, including three in the top five and six of the top ten.

As a whole, however, college basketball is shattering records, in a good way.

Ken Pomeroy of the Athletic broke down the latest trends of college basketball, and the numbers are mind-boggling. We are seeing an all-time high in free-throw percentage, three-point attempts, two-point percentage, among many other categories.

Shooting continues to improve. For the third consecutive season, free-throw percentage and 3-point attempts are at all-time highs. For the second consecutive season, 2-point percentage is at an all-time high. And 3-point percentage is the highest it’s been since the line was moved to its current location 10 seasons ago.

All of the great shooting has led to teams making a collective 51.0 percent (effective FG) of their attempts, which would break the all-time record of 50.5 set last season.

While these numbers are all positive and show the actual product is improving, the most shocking statistic involves total free throw attempts.

Officials have been the center of controversy, and watching some Kentucky games have been like watching free throw contests, but we’ve actually seen the fewest number of free throws this season since 1974.

The most dramatic change is in the number of free throws being shot. I haven’t heard any discussion of this, but fouls are noticeably down. Like, way down. There have been 18.3 fouls per game compared to 18.9 last season and 19.4 two seasons ago. In 2014, there were 19.2 fouls per game. The resulting free throws that season helped bump up efficiency to a level we won’t reach this season despite much better shooting.

Along the same lines, teams have shot an average of 19.5 free throws per game compared to 22.3 in 2014. This season will have the fewest free throws since 1974, when there were 18.9 attempts per game.

The visual showing the difference is wild.

So where do the Wildcats come into play on this?

Right now, Kentucky’s effective field goal percentage comes out to 50.79%, which is right around the national average. They’re currently shooting 47% total from the field, 51% from two, and 33% from three. Again, right on line with the rest of college basketball.

They are also shooting 69% from the free-throw line on 623 total attempts. UK players have committed 477 total fouls, good for 131st-most in the entire nation and an average of 19 fouls per contest, less than one above the national average.

Kentucky opponents, however, are shooting 68% from the free throw line and have committed 508 total fouls. They’re shooting 41% from the field, 29% from three, and have an EFG% of 47.11%, proving the Cats are impressing on the defensive side of the ball.

All in all, despite this being a “down” year for Kentucky basketball, we’re right on line with the rest of college basketball.

Yes, you read that correctly.

According to the numbers, your Wildcats are actually contributing to a historically great basketball season.

To read KenPom’s entire article breaking down the latest trend of college basketball, head on over here.

Article written by Jack Pilgrim

Follow me on Twitter: @JackPilgrimKSR

17 Comments for Does Kentucky follow the latest trend of college basketball?



  1. KYcats11
    10:17 pm February 13, 2018 Permalink

    I’m confused…



    • syrin23
      11:08 pm February 13, 2018 Permalink

      I guarantee our numbers look much worse if you look at just the past five games.



  2. BradCalthegoat
    10:41 pm February 13, 2018 Permalink

    Me too



  3. MadHatter
    11:02 pm February 13, 2018 Permalink

    Lol gotta love when ksr tries to put makeup on a pig



    • mm40
      11:43 pm February 13, 2018 Permalink

      I don’t see that they were trying to put makeup on a pig, I thought the stats were presented in a very fair way and the writer simply pointed out that UK was at about the national average in those categories.



    • 4everUKblue
      6:24 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      Hatter’s been waiting for a chance to use that one.



    • timbo
      7:55 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      Yeah! Stats aren’t true!



  4. TB112162
    2:13 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

    I don’t care about the numbers the only numbers that matter are wins and losses



  5. Kevin C
    2:22 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

    It’s the turnovers and low assist-to-fgm ratio that’s killing this team.



    • timbo
      7:56 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      This is probably quite accurate.



  6. BigBlueNationDude
    2:37 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

    Cal is obsessed with the freak athlete guy and measurables. I dont think he evaluates shooting and bball knowledge enough.



    • 4everUKblue
      6:27 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      Wait…..Your’e thinking again Slater?? Maybe you should do some research on Cal’s record at UK as a whole or is that too big a task for you?



    • timbo
      7:56 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      Easy to evaluate yours…



  7. henderblue
    7:27 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

    Fewest number of free throws? They must have not included SEC stats. They are calling fouls on every trip down the floor and it seems like the free throws are flying at an all-time high.



  8. Duuuuuude
    8:51 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

    Yay, we are average! Go us!



    • Jiminy Crickets
      10:06 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      So we’re not tall, but we’re not short. We’re not fat, but we’re not skinny. There’s what 200 college D1 teams? And we’re pretty much at the 50% line in every category. Numbers can be presented to meet your objective, and the objective of the article was to show “see, were not as bad as it looks”



    • Duuuuuude
      11:00 am February 14, 2018 Permalink

      Gold standard!