Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

Can Kentucky’s 2018 Team Shoot?

USA Basketball

During the 2017 preseason, college basketball prognosticators liked what they saw in the Cats, with one exception — Kentucky’s outside shooting ability.  The players laughed it off in interviews.  “Are you serious?” was a common response to the question.  The players proved the prognosticators wrong by shooting over 35 percent during the season.

Eight minutes after the Diallo news broke and four minutes before he confirmed it on Twitter, we heard that question about next year’s team for the first time: “Can anybody on Kentucky’s team shoot?”

Steve Jones of The Courier-Journal was the first to ask it, but he will not be the last.  This year’s skeptics have much more evidence to point to this year than they did last year.

Improving Shooters

Since Kevin Knox committed, an overwhelming majority of fans believe he will be able to play the two-guard next year because of his ability to make shots from long-range.  Would they be saying that if they knew Knox only made 25.8 percent of his threes in EYBL play last year?


Knox and Jarred Vanderbilt share a similar build.  Knox is the better offensive player.  Vanderbilt is the better defensive player.  Knox’s shot looks better when it leaves his hands, but a year ago neither were consistent outside threats.  The good news: a lot has changed in a year.

Knox’s three-point shot dramatically improved from the summer into his senior season, shooting 35 percent from three during his high school season for Tampa Catholic.  At McDonald’s All-American practices, Knox and Vanderbilt’s improved shooting ability from long-range was the greatest takeaway from recruiting reporters and analysts in the stands.  Vanderbilt’s change was the most impressive.  His unorthodox form didn’t change, but he extended his release point and added more rotation to the ball.

This pair can knock down open shots, but Calipari can not rely on them to be his primary outside shooting weapons.


Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Hamidou Diallo are both lengthy athletes who will make their money on their ability to get to the basket.  Diallo dunks, while SGA creates contact before a soft floater rolls through the rim.

From behind the three-point line, SGA is another player who improved throughout his senior season.  He finished the season shooting 31 percent from behind the three-point line.  Not too shabby.  He was even better in the Derby Festival Classic; he missed just three shots in the game and won the three-point shooting competition.

Diallo is a curious case.  We haven’t seen him shoot a competitive basketball shot in about a year, so I’ll tell you about the first time I saw him play.

Last July I was at the Peach Jam for the first time.  After figuring out the lay of the land, I found a spot in the corner to see Hamidou Diallo play.  A couple easy fast break dunks were impressive, but I wanted to see how the No. 1 shooting guard in the nation shot the ball.  I was disappointed, to say the least.  I spent the entire game trashing his flat shot.  He didn’t take many from deep because he didn’t need to, he could simply get to the rim, but every time he did launch a three, I was prepared to see it clank off the rim.

I actually enjoyed his awfulness for awhile, then proceeded to look through the program to find out where I needed to go to see the next candidate for “best shooter in the class.”  A close game for Diallo’s New York Rens, I couldn’t leave until the fat lady sang.  With about ten seconds remaining, Diallo’s team was trailing by three points.

“Okay, Diallo.  Show me what you got,”  I thought to myself.  He showed me he has ice in his veins.  Facing a triple team on the left wing, all he needed was a subtle jab to create enough space for a turn-around.  The fade-away three from 30 feet barely touched the net on its way through the rim.  He pumped his chest on the ground while the crowd erupted.  Hami’s opponents didn’t stand a chance in overtime as he carried his team to victory.

Just like every part of his game — excluding his vertical leap — the jury is still out on Diallo.

Quade and Baker


Jemarl Baker was targeted for his three-point shooting ability, but based purely off senior season numbers, he will not be the best shooter on the team next year.  Baker made 34 percent of his threes; Quade Green knocked down 38 percent of his three-pointers.

Baker can earn playing time by entering the “knock down three-point shooter” role, but it took Mychal Mulder a year at Kentucky to get comfortable on the floor.  Feeling comfortable won’t be a problem with Quade.  In fact, Quade’s biggest problem might be getting too comfortable.

At his best running the floor and creating for others, his step-back jumper is his primary weapon to get points.  Great at creating contact to get space, the ball looks good every time it leaves his hand inside 12 feet.  When he gets beyond the three-point line, he’ll stress you out.  Like Tyler Ulis, he prefers three-pointers that are five feet behind the line.  Unlike Ulis, he shoots the ball from behind his head.  It’s odd, but it keeps defenders from blocking his shot and it still goes in 38 percent of the time.

Green will hear comparisons to Ulis all year long. “I’m trying to be better than Tyler (Ulis).  I’m going in with a different mindset: be the best player I can be and be better than all the point guards that ever came through there.”

Calipari needs Quade to be one of the best shooting point guards he’s ever coached.  There are other options, but finding consistency from behind the three-point line could be the Cats’ Kryptonite in 2018.

Article written by Nick Roush

"Look upon the doughnut, and not upon the hole." @RoushKSR

18 Comments for Can Kentucky’s 2018 Team Shoot?

  1. bdmnky81
    7:44 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    How about free throws? With ao many rim attackers, i would like to know if they convert a decent amount of freebies….

    • CstlCAT22
      9:46 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

      Your comment is the only the only one that makes sense. Those are their strengths and that’s the biggest question. We’ve never been a great shooting team per say… Not Cal’s focus. Physicality, athleticism, and simplicity is his goal. We’ve had some guys to make big shot when they’re needed, but great consistent shooting is brought up ever single year.

    • catsby.5
      10:45 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      First of all it’s “per se,” secondly you are a clown if you think shooting is not a priority for Calipari. See: Devin Booker, Jamal Murray, etc.

    • Megan
      11:21 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      Se it ain’t so!

    • Luether
      7:54 pm May 28, 2017 Permalink

      This will be a typical Cal coached FT shooting team. For the Democrats in the audience, this means we’ll lose some games because of poor FT shooting…

  2. maximumscott
    8:20 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    If they play good perimeter defense, and good defense overall then they wont have to rely on the 3 that much. Id say Cal starts work inmediately on Defense and slowly works the offense.

  3. TBW3011
    8:35 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    Knox is not a 2 guard. His handles are average at best. Nice player, but not a 2.

  4. GroundControlToNumber9
    9:17 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    “Baker can earn playing time by entering the “knock down three-point shooter” role, but it took Mychal Mulder a year at Kentucky to get comfortable on the floor.”

    What in the world does Mulder never getting comfortable on the big stage have to do with Baker let alone anyone else. Do you know Baker? Have you seen him play?

    He’s a confident guy who’s blue collar through and through. Blue collar guys don’t shy away from the big stage.

  5. a21CATSfan
    9:27 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    After having several offensive liabilities the past couple of years (Marcus Lee, Alex Poythress, Charles Matthews, Isaiah Briscoe and Bam Adebayo at times), I don’t believe we will have that problem. Cal has 8 guys who can dribble pass and shoot and 3 big bodies to rotate at the 5.

    • Megan
      11:24 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      32 percent from three is equivalent to 48 percent from two. Not bad. Not great, but not bad. You hit 48 percent from the field, you win most games if you have any defense.

  6. guindage
    11:04 pm May 27, 2017 Permalink

    Absurd to not mention Gabriel.

    • BBNDan7
      12:02 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      Gabriel shot well from behind the line in like 2 games

    • guindage
      9:44 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      Incorrect. He shot 32% from behind the arc and has a very nice shot. More than that, he’s our most experienced returning player so to leave him out of the analysis is, as I said, absurd.

    • catsarerunnin
      10:38 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

      And as we all know 32% is pretty good.

    • guindage
      1:05 pm May 28, 2017 Permalink

      Not sure if you read the article, but do you think 31% in high school is more relevant to 32% in college? I mean, if you read the article and don’t believe Gabriel should’ve been mentioned then I think we’re done here.

  7. BobNWeaver
    12:14 am May 28, 2017 Permalink

    UK will be so tall and athletic that teams will have no choice but to play a packed-in zone defense. If we hit open shots (12 footers and 3 pointers) then we will score enough to win given how good our defense will be. If we can’t hit open shots, then games will be low scoring and close (again because of our defense).

  8. Skeps
    1:03 pm May 29, 2017 Permalink

    What about swag? Do they have it? Shooting is not important.

  9. BigBlueBass
    8:46 pm May 29, 2017 Permalink

    There goes the 3 point shot streak…….. I’m joking calm down limp wristed liberals