Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

How UK monitors student athletes on Twitter

“@bookie3_FLYA: Swagg on bumish tonight.. But u kno wat Idc kno why I can Kill the scene in like 15 min. Wit Swagg.. Lol”

Was that tweet from Bookie Cobbins flagged for using one of the hundreds of keywords UK’s Twitter monitoring software looks for? If so, Joker Phillips received an e-mail in his inbox with the tweet. That’s how the social media monitoring works at UK and at UofL. The two schools use a system that searches for keywords, ranging from alcohol-related words to the names of sports agents, and then e-mails flagged tweets to the individual’s coach.

According to the Courier-Journal, all of Kentucky’s student athletes are required to use a system called Centrix Social, which cost the school $7,500 in 2011, but dropped to $6,000 this year. Louisville pays $6,450 for UDiligence, although football and men’s basketball players are not monitored. Only UofL golf, softball, baseball, soccer, swimming and diving, rowing, women’s tennis, track, and women’s basketball are required to use it. (Because the rowing team is always up to no good.)

Some say it’s an invasion of privacy, but one UK student, a former football walk-on, doesn’t see a problem with it.

“I feel like it’s OK to monitor to make sure they’re not representing the university in a bad way,” he said. “Monitoring, I think it’s pretty smart.”

The Courier-Journal discovered two of the words in the ‘P’ section of the keyword bank: “pony” and “panties.” Pony is one way of referring to crack cocaine; panties are what Georgia’s former athletic director keeps between his legs when he drives drunk.

The C-J’s report also included an example of one of the flagged tweets: “I thought I found the girl of my dreams at the strip club.” While that could be true, I believe the student was only using a lyric from Drake’s “Over My Dead Body”, but could’ve done a better job of making that clear.

It seems like this is just one more headache a head coach doesn’t need and should’ve have to deal with.

University of Kentucky, Louisville forbid athletes from using hundreds of Twitter words

Article written by Drew Franklin

I can recite every line from Forrest Gump, blindfolded. Follow me on Twitter: @DrewFranklinKSR

9 Comments for How UK monitors student athletes on Twitter

  1. Musehobo
    12:56 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    Biggest take from all this…UL doesn’t really want to monitor their money-making athletes.

  2. SexnNursinHomes
    1:02 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    Charlie Strong banned “Hot Karl” from Twitter, because it was getting to be a problem in the locker room.

  3. EJXD2
    1:03 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    Hilarious that anyone would call this “an invasion of privacy”.

    If something as innocent (and square) as “panties” is on the list, I wonder how many variations of those unmentionables also made the cut. Someone posting lyrics to Sisquo’s “Thong Song” would probably make coach’s smart phone blow up.

  4. big tim
    1:24 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    uofl monitor must not be that good when there was a uofl player twitter name with cocaine in it

  5. Rockfield, KY
    1:28 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    4. Please see #1’s comment. He nailed it. They don’t monitor football and basketball, because it would be impossible for them to keep up, and they’re scared of losing their cash cows.

  6. UKBlue
    1:30 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    Classic UL, why even spend the money if you aren’t going to monitor your 2 biggest programs.

  7. Musehobo
    1:37 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    It’s really absurd. What reason could they possibly give for exempting the bball and football players from the system they pay for?

  8. twitter
    1:57 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    UL basketball team isn’t allowed to have Twitter accounts

  9. Centrix Social
    8:06 pm August 20, 2012 Permalink

    It was flagged for being unintelligible gibberish.