Skip to content

Kentucky Sports Radio

University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.

BTI’s Rants and Ramblings: How to pick the 1st two rounds

Some trends and tips to keep in mind when trying to pick the 1st two rounds of the NCAA Tournament.  And if you take this advice and make money in your pools, I get a 15 percent royalty.  All of these numbers come from trends from the last 10 NCAA Tournaments. 

1ST ROUND

1. Pick around 8 upsets in the first round

-There have been a total of 80 “upsets” in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament over the last 10 years, or an average of 8 a year for you psychology majors.  And by upset, I simply mean a worse seeded team beating a better seeded team, including 9’s over 8’s.  There have been as many as 13 upsets in the first round (2001) and as few as 4 upsets (2004).

2. Avoid the 15 and 16 seeds

-Duh.  But just to emphasize that point, only once in the last 10 years has a 15 or 16 seed won a game, and that was Hampton in 2001.  Not worth the risk.  Again duh.

3. Pick two 8 seeds and two 9 seeds

-Since 2001, a total of 40 games have been played between 8 and 9 seeds.  The count is 20-20.  So, the best way to handle that would be to pick 2 of each seed.  Whatever you do, don’t pick the same seed in all 4 games.  It’s only happened twice in 10 years, the 8 seeds in 2002 and the 9 seeds in 2001.
The best picks: Michigan, George Mason, Illinois, Old Dominion

4. Always pick a 12, just don’t go crazy with them

-The old rule always says that a 12 seed beats a 5 seed.  And it’s almost true.  In the last 10 years, a 12 has won at least 1 game in 9 of those years.  But all total, 12 seeds are just 17-23 against the 5 seeds.  Point being, make sure you pick a 12 seed, but don’t pick more than 2.
The pick: Utah State

5. Pick ONE 13 seed to win a game

-10 years, 10 wins.  That is what the 13 seeds have.  They have a win in 8 of the 10 seasons used.  Find your strongest 13 seed and pick them.  Then avoid the rest.
The pick: Belmont

2ND ROUND

1. Avoid picking against the 1 seed

-In the last 10 years, there have been 40 total 1-seeds.  Only FOUR have not reached the Sweet 16.  Amazingly, twice it was the overall #1 seed.  But anyway, it is far too risky to pick against the 1-seeds in the 2nd round.  May as well move them straight to the Sweet 16.

2. A 2-seed will get beat

-Only once in 10 years has every 2 seed advanced to the Sweet 16.  A total of 15 times a 2 seed has been beaten.  It will almost surely happen.  So while it might be tough to pick a Temple or UCLA to get to the Sweet 16, it never fails that there will be at least 1 surprise with the 2 seeds.  But, don’t go out of control with those upsets.  In each of the 10 years, at least two of the 2 seeds has advanced.  So, don’t over think it too much.
The 2-seed to get beat: North Carolina

3. Picking a 13 seed or 12 seed to make the Sweet 16 is risky

-It’s only happened 7 times in the last 10 years, and in only 4 of those did the 12/13 seed have to beat the 4 AND 5 seeds to make it there.  Point is, unless you have a 12 and 13 meeting in the 2nd round, it is not likely one of those teams will advance past the 2nd round.

Article written by Bryan the Intern

19 Comments for BTI’s Rants and Ramblings: How to pick the 1st two rounds



  1. ruh-roh
    9:08 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    isn’t UK playing a 13 seed ?



  2. ruh-roh
    9:13 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    then again, so is Louisville …



  3. knightynight
    9:40 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    This was a pretty awesome post, i must admit.



  4. SexnNursinHomes
    9:43 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    BTI did his homework on this one.



  5. JDWest
    9:44 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    BTI’s first good post. Well done.



  6. Scratch
    9:45 am March 15, 2011 Permalink


  7. ThatsAShame
    9:46 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    BTI. Your posts have been fair of recent.



  8. Bryan the Intern
    9:59 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    7) I haven’t been feeling well. I should be able to throw in a sucky post in the next few days.



  9. Carolina Blue is past tense for CAROLINA BLOWS
    10:07 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    The earlier time slot has made BTI smarter somehow. You can throw these statistics out. In a normal year these rules may work. However, the committee screwed the seeding up therefore these rules will not apply this year.



  10. Steady
    10:20 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    Does any of this apply to a bracket put together by a bunch of freaking dumba**es?



  11. barn
    10:25 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    -6-how could they leave out the stanford tree?



  12. SexnNursinHomes
    10:31 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    8- Ill? Is it fungicysticits?



  13. encephalo
    10:50 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    great post. creative, thorough and practical. good stuff



  14. dgtuk
    11:02 am March 15, 2011 Permalink

    8…BTI…glad to hear the explanation for the well thought out post….Now don’t let that happen again!



  15. DweezyUK
    12:33 pm March 15, 2011 Permalink

    Nothing to do with this thread but nice to see the Herald Leader is ripping off BTI from 5 days ago with the revenge thread.



  16. KY_Wildcat_AL
    2:19 pm March 15, 2011 Permalink

    Did we have another blogger contest???
    Did a blogger “bite the dust”?
    Who is this new blogger, Bryan the Intern, who writes GOOD articles?
    Is he being tutored by Ms Tyler T?



  17. bald knob
    2:41 pm March 15, 2011 Permalink

    Acutally, if the 8’s and 9’s are 50/50 since 2001, wouldn’t it make more sense to pick all 8’s or all 9’s?? Then you would be guaranteed to get at least 2 out of 4 right. If you pick 2 8’s and 2 9’s, you have a much better chance of missing all 4 matchups.



  18. Ky_Tom
    9:09 pm March 15, 2011 Permalink

    If the seeding were right, then UK is the weakest 4 seed..Thats because the #1 over all seed gets the weakest other seeds in the bracket.
    So from that format..N Carolina is the weakest 2, and Syacuse is the weakest 3 seed and UK the 4..
    I don’t buy this format because UK is better than UofL and Wisconsin and Texas, maybe Texas is a tad bit higher but…..

    in other words..The NCAA Selection committee really screwed up big time this year and once again UK gets the short end of the stick.



  19. bald knob
    9:00 am March 16, 2011 Permalink

    I know no one will read this, but I contradicted one of the bullet points in this entry and I’ve been deleted. I make one comment in 6 months and it is taken down. I think I’m done here. You guys believe that you’re much cooler than you really are. I hope you realize this soon so you don’t look so foolish. Bye.