< Back
University of Kentucky Basketball, Football, and Recruiting news brought to you in the most ridiculous manner possible.
An outsider’s view on Kentucky’s win over LSU
by Aaron Torres on January 4, 2018 at 11:00 pm

One of the cool things about my job here at KSR, is that this is the first time in my career that I’ve ever really been a “beat writer.” In the past I’ve spent so much time covering the national scene (and still do) that I haven’t had time to really follow a team from start to finish, watch them grow, watch them get better and watch them mature as the season has gone on.

Therefore, you can imagine how much fun I’m having covering this particular Kentucky team. It certainly isn’t the most talented of the Calipari era (or at least doesn’t appear to be at this point in the season anyway) but it’s also a group that’s impossible not to like. A group that — at least right now — plays hard, plays for each other, and oh by the way is getting better with every game. Had you asked me what the ceiling was for this team after the Kansas game, I would have said “not good.” Only here we are less than two months later and I’m genuinely intrigued to see what this team is capable of by March.

And no place was that more evident than on Wednesday night in Baton Rouge. While some will look at a 74-71 win over LSU as not very impressive (more on that coming) I think it’s the opposite. In a true road environment, this young team handled itself well, and — like they have as the competition has improved the last few weeks — seems to be getting better with each and every game.

I’ve done takeaways columns recently after both the UCLA and Louisville games and have found them incredibly therapeutic — here are some thoughts on Wednesday’s win over LSU:

What in the world has gotten into Shai Gilgeous-Alexander?

So, Jack had his magic beanstalk beans. Popeye had his spinach. Mark McGwire had copious amounts of steroids. And Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has his new haircut, apparently. Honestly, the new haircut is the only logical explanation for the sudden uptick in Gilgeous-Alexander’s game, and it’s clear that his barber’s clippers gave him super powers. That’s really the only explanation I’ve got.

In all seriousness, I can’t ever remember a single player, making a single bigger leap in a shorter amount of time than Gilgeous-Alexander has in these last few games. For months we were told how much potential Gilgeous-Alexander had and it seems like it’s finally all clicked since the Louisville game (the first with the new haircut).

Looking at his numbers tells the entire story. In his last three games, Gilgeous-Alexander is averaging 21 points and four assists per game, and the best part he hasn’t forced any of it. He has only attempted 41 total shots in those three games (an average of about 14 a game) and has been a hyper-efficient 51 percent from the field. He also isn’t a great three-point shooter at this point in his career, and has limited himself to just five attempts over that stretch, preferring to attack the basket.  In the process, he is also showing off skills that most of us (or at least me) didn’t know he had, including those wild, lefty finishes in the lane. Point being, that in the last three games, Gilgeous-Alexander has been the team’s best (and most efficient) scorer, distributor and finisher. Not bad for one the “lower” rated recruits in this freshman class, huh?

By the way, you know what the best part of Gilgeous-Alexander’s night was Wednesday against LSU? In addition to everything he did offensively, he also perfectly defended Tremont Waters last shot defensively as well. He kept Waters in front of him, and when LSU’s freshman guard tried to jump into him to create a foul, Gilgeous-Alexander backed off and watched as the shot missed wildly. That’s the kind of basketball smarts you simply can’t teach.

Now granted, I’m not sold that this all means that Gilgeous-Alexander is going to springboard to the NBA like some do. But right now he is a really, REALLY good player for Kentucky. And apparently, it’s all thanks to a haircut.

Wednesday also marked the best game of P.J. Washington’s young career as well

For those of you who have followed my work here on KSR over the last few months, you know that my relationship with Washington has basically been like that of two teens that have just begun dating. I loved him to start the season, then I hated him, then I wasn’t really sure, then I didn’t like him, and after last night, I love him again. Safe to say if we were in a relationship on Facebook, this whole thing would definitely be “complicated.”

The simple truth is however that Wednesday night unequivocally marked the best game he’s played at Kentucky, and showed exactly what he’s capable of being. After a slow start, he was dynamite in the second half as a guy who found little seems in the defense, and was able to throw down one uncontested dunk after the other. I went back and looked at the game log this morning just to make sure my eyes didn’t deceive me, and nope, Washington was every bit as good as I thought. Not only did he finish with 18 points on 8 of 11 shooting, but went five for five from the field in the second half.

On this particular team, Washington doesn’t need to be great. But on a night where the front-court was limited because of a flu bug, the Wildcats needed him to step up. And he did just that in Baton Rouge.

Speaking of the flu:

It’s funny because as the game was going on, I kind of wondered why a couple guys — mostly Hamidou Diallo and Nick Richards — weren’t playing very much, especially late in the game. Specifically, Diallo had a couple of questionable decisions early on and I wondered if John Calipari was sitting him late as a form of “punishment.”

Instead, as it turned out, apparently the Wildcats were dealing with a darn-near team-wide case of the flu. Who knew??

(By the way, with all the money the Wildcats spend on facilities, dorms, travel and overall other basketball expenses, you would have thought they could spare a few bucks for flu shots? Kidding, kidding)

Honestly though, does anyone else kind of wonder if the team-wide illness was kind of a blessing in disguise? It allowed other guys ranging from Gilgeous-Alexander, Washington and Wenyen Gabriel to get big minutes and crunch-time reps down the stretch.

Look, depth is great. But the minutes that those guys played Wednesday should be invaluable going forward.

Speaking of Wenyen Gabriel

If you’ve been reading these little recaps I do after some of the biggest games, you know that I’ve spent the last few weeks raving about Wenyen Gabriel. He was basically the only guy who came to play against UCLA (a sentiment shared by John Calipari) and was great against Louisville as well. Last night was no different.

And really, Gabriel is the perfect example of why it’s so important to watch the games, rather than just look at the box scores. If you simply look at the box score, you’d see a guy who played 22 minutes, had just four points and four rebounds and say “Meh, what a forgettable game.”

Of course if you watched the game you know that Gabriel once again played an important 22 minutes. He hit a big three-pointer (just like he did late against Georgia), and also grabbed a couple big loose ball rebounds, including one with under two minutes to go which gave Kentucky an extra possession, which let them burn an extra 30 seconds off the clock and ended with a Gilgeous-Alexander layup which gave the Wildcats a four-point lead Kentucky would never relinquish.

As I said a few days back after the Louisville game, not every kid can be a star, and for any team to be successful they need guys who are willing to come in off the bench, play a role, and help their team win with all the little plays. Gabriel appears to be that guy.

My favorite part of Wednesday’s game had nothing to do with basketball

Want to know what my favorite part of Wednesday’s game was? I’m not sure exactly when it happened, but at some point (I believe in the first half), the broadcaster was referencing how much tougher things have gotten under new coach Will Wade at LSU, and he dropped a gem that sounded a little something like this:

“We were at walk-through today and the Tigers were working hard! I tell ya, we’ve been to practices here in Baton Rouge that weren’t as tough as that walk-through today.”

As one of Johnny Jones’ biggest critics through the years, I’ve got to ask: What the hell was Jones doing at practice when he was head coach at LSU that… WALK THROUGHS ARE NOW TOUGHER THAN HIS PRACTICES WERE?

Seriously, what exactly did LSU do at practice during that stretch? Play heated games of “H-O-R-S-E?” Spend hours practicing trick shots? Watch cartoons in the film room? Play duck, duck, goose to determine rotations? I need answers dammit!!!

I mean I knew Johnny Jones was bad, but that comment alone is next level stuff. I really hope that we get one of those “SEC Storied” documentaries on the Johnny Jones era in the next few years.

With that said, LSU is much improved and this win is important

Although I just spent the last 250 or so words crushing Johnny Jones (because if I don’t, who will?), I want to make one thing abundantly clear: I respect the hell out of what Will Wade has done this year at LSU. He has taken a steaming pile of hot trash, put out the fire, sorted out the parts, and what you’ve got left is a decent, rapidly-improving basketball program.

Seriously, I’ve been on the Tigers since the opening game of the Maui Invitational when they shocked a good Michigan club, and it was at that moment I realized that LSU was going to be much improved under Wade. They have since proven me right, with a solid win against Houston (a potential NCAA Tournament team) and a win last week at Memphis. I know that Memphis is bad this year, but remember, LSU was picked to finish dead last in the SEC in the preseason. How many clubs picked to finish last in power conferences would you say could have definitively won at Memphis? I’m guessing Pitt wouldn’t have. Same with Georgetown or DePaul in the Big East, or Washington State in the Pac-12.

Therefore, that’s also why I was so impressed with Kentucky on Wednesday night. Not because the LSU game will go down as this team’s most memorable game (it won’t), and not because they don’t need work (they do, especially on perimeter defense). Instead, it’s because the Wildcats went into a road gym for the first time as a team, were short-handed because of illness, played a rapidly improving club with decent talent (including a potential future All-SEC guard in Tremont Waters) and still managed to get a win.

It wasn’t always pretty, but considering the circumstances it was an important win none the less.

It also helped explain why John Calipari often likes to say “Yup, I like this team.”

8 Replies to “An outsider’s view on Kentucky’s win over LSU”

  1. Rixter says:

    Great point about Shai’s defense on the last shot. Truth is, that play usually results in a foul… for a freshman to have the basketball IQ to recognize it, and back off, says a lot about the young man.

  2. unbridled says:

    I like that the cats never really looked rattled. Lsu is a decent team. They have three really good players. Waters is legit. The crowd was loud and the young cats got their first taste of a hostile sec road game…..and won. Good on them and back to work.

  3. J-Dub421 says:

    Another good article, Aaron.

  4. Steady says:

    Good read. Love me some SGA. I like my team!

  5. rainman says:

    And it couldn’t possibly because this kid WORKS HIS BUTT OFF?
    I think your article, although partially tongue I cheek, slights the fact
    this kid is a true student of the game! He is a blast to watch!

  6. scwhite9 says:

    Great article, Aaron. I love your analysis. When I went to the Women’s Clinic, I told everyone I just loved this group. They all seemed to get along so well. Teamwork will be one of their advantages later on in the year.

  7. chris4uk says:

    Aaron, include this in your podcast and I’ll re-subscribe. I gave your podcast several tries, but not even mentioning the UK-UL game did me in.

  8. EdC says:

    Wait you’re an outsider? Who knew? You should make that better known.

Comments are closed.